Rutgers Law - Appellate Advocacy Fall 2009

Rutgers Law School

Appellate Advocacy - Fall 2009

The case argued by the students in this class during the Fall of 2009 was:

State v. Clancy Wiggum

Note: Many files on this site are in PDF format, and you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to read them. If you don't have this free add-on to your web browser, you may download it directly from Adobe.

The moot court case was loosely based on the real cases of State v. Chen, __ N.J. __ (2011) [decided by the NJ Supreme Court 8/24/2011], and State v. Hupka, 203 N.J. 222 (2010), raising issues of the admissibility of eyewitness identification testimony in the face of possible witness taint and the permanent forfeiture of public employment on conviction of certain crimes.